Flagships · 2 volumes

£200bn of pipeline depends on two disciplines, and neither is settled.

Cross-sector flagship studies — protective security of the public realm, and the practice of consultation.

Two flagship studies that sit across every sector rather than inside one. Six findings each, every figure traced to a named primary source and carried at a stated verification date. Scroll down to see what is in them.

Browse both studies →Email a specialist →

The problem

Eight statutes. Six bridges. No road.

Bridges exist. A road does not.

The root cause

Why does that happen? Because the duty is split across statutes and no single profession owns the whole of it.

Streets, parks and crowded places sit under one regime; defended assets and their perimeters under another.

The turn

Two studies map both worlds and the gap between them.

Six findings each, six propositions each, and recommendations aimed at government, regulators, professions and clients.

Proof

NAP3, the £200bn pipeline and the IAP2 Spectrum, read against the case law that actually governs consultation.

Two worlds. One discipline.

What you get

Check which statute actually applies to your scheme before you write the security case.

See where statutory consultation ends and strategic engagement begins, with the case law behind the line.

Read the six propositions in each study, and what each one asks of government, regulators and clients.

Understand the disciplines that cut across every sector you already read.

The two flagship studies

Two studies that sit across every sector rather than inside one. Six findings and six propositions each, every figure traced to a named primary source and carried at a stated verification date.

FS001

No Road.